$id = '230'
$options = array(
'conditions' => array(
'Blog.id' => '230'
)
)
$blog = array(
'Blog' => array(
'id' => '230',
'title' => 'Is it true?',
'desc' => '<p style="text-align:justify">Today I would like to share with you the newsletter which I received yesterday from my good friend Bob Tiede. Thank you Bob for sharing this great message!</p>
<p style="text-align:justify">Be blessed, your Christian Pälchen</p>
<table style="width:740px">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>A Note From Bob:<br />
Tomorrow is Good Friday – the day over 2000 years ago when Jesus – falsely accused – was sentenced to the most cruel death ever invented – death by crucifixion on a cross! That day Jesus paid the penalty for the sins of every woman and man who had or would ever live. After he died he was taken down from that cross and laid in a borrowed grave through the generosity of a friend. The day after the Sabbath – on the first day of the week – 3 women came to his tomb to anoint his body and they found the stone that had covered his tomb rolled away and the tomb was empty. An angel appeared to them and said, “He is not here – He is Risen!” That was of course the first Easter – the day that over 2 billion followers of Jesus will celebrate this coming Sunday.<br />
Christianity Rests on the Resurrection of ChristThe Apostle Paul in I Corinthians, Chapter 15 wrote:<strong><em>“If Christ has not been raised, our preaching is useless and …. your faith is futile; you are still in your sins. If only for this life we have hope in Christ, we are of all people most to be pitied.”</em></strong><strong>Christianity rests on the resurrection of Christ. If it is true then it changes everything! If it is not true then over 2 billion believers around the globe, including me, have bet their lives on a lie! And as the Apostle Paul wrote, <em>“If Christ has not been raised…we are of all people most to be pitied.”</em></strong>Is there evidence for the Resurrection of Christ?</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table style="width:740px">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><img alt="" src="https://mcusercontent.com/4320a50bc672b2862b6f985c0/images/a8a6b533-e84c-4b78-bc58-9cbd19f00e22.jpg" style="height:auto; width:734px" /></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table style="width:740px">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><strong><a href="https://leadingwithquestions.us3.list-manage.com/track/click?u=4320a50bc672b2862b6f985c0&id=4474538d48&e=df0aac804c" rel="noreferrer noopener" style="color: rgb(72, 184, 141); opacity: 1; text-decoration-line: none;" target="_blank">Josh McDowell</a>, </strong> my colleague of 24 years and his son <a href="https://leadingwithquestions.us3.list-manage.com/track/click?u=4320a50bc672b2862b6f985c0&id=a7cd37a458&e=df0aac804c" rel="noreferrer noopener" style="color: rgb(72, 184, 141); opacity: 1; text-decoration-line: none;" target="_blank"><strong>Sean McDowell</strong></a> have given me their kind permission to “Excerpt” from Chapter 10 of their book <strong>“More Than a Carpenter”</strong> which has been translated into 128 languages with over 27 million books printed:<br />
<strong>Chapter 10 – Can You Keep a Good Man Down?</strong>A student at the University of Uruguay asked me, “Professor McDowell, why couldn’t you find some way to refute Christianity?”I answered, “For a very simple reason. I was unable to explain away the fact that the resurrection of Jesus Christ was a real event in history.”<br />
<br />
<strong>After spending more than seven hundred hours studying this subject and thoroughly investigating its foundation, I came to the conclusion that the resurrection of Jesus Christ is either one of the most wicked, vicious, heartless hoaxes ever foisted on humanity, or it is the most important fact in history.The Resurrection takes the question “Is Christianity valid?” out of the realm of philosophy and makes it a question of history.</strong><br />
<br />
Does Christianity have a solid historical basis?Is sufficient evidence available to warrant belief in the Resurrection?Here are some of the issues and claims relevant to the question: Jesus of Nazareth, a Jewish prophet who claimed to be the Christ prophesied in the Jewish Scriptures, was arrested, judged to be a political criminal, and crucified. Three days after his death and burial, some women who went to his tomb found the body to be missing. Christ’s disciples claimed that God had raised him from the dead and that he had appeared to them many times before ascending to heaven.From this foundation, Christianity spread throughout the Roman Empire and has continued to exert great influence throughout the world through all subsequent centuries.<br />
<br />
<strong>The big question is, Did the Resurrection actually happen?The Death and Burial of Jesus</strong><br />
<br />
After Jesus was condemned to death, he was stripped of his clothing and was whipped, according to Roman custom, before crucifixion.Alexander Metherell, who holds a medical degree from the University of Miami and a doctorate in engineering from the University of Bristol in England, made a detailed examination of Christ’s whipping at the hands of the Romans. He explains the process:The soldier would use a whip of braided leather thongs with metal balls woven into them. When the whip would strike the flesh, these balls would cause deep bruises or contusions, which would break open with further blows. And the whip had pieces of sharp bone as well, which would cut the flesh severely.The back would be so shredded that part of the spine was sometimes exposed by the deep, deep cuts. The whipping would have gone all the way from the shoulders down to the back, the buttocks, and the back of the legs. It was just terrible.One physician who has studied Roman beatings said, “As the flogging continued, the lacerations would tear into the underlying skeletal muscles and produce quivering ribbons of bleeding flesh.” A third-century historian by the name of Eusebius described flogging by saying, “The sufferer’s veins were laid bare, and the very muscles, sinews, and bowels of the victim were open to exposure.”We know that many people would die from this kind of beating even before they could be crucified. At the least, the victim would experience tremendous pain and go into hypovolemic shock.Given the brutality of the whipping, as well as his subsequent crucifixion, it is historically certain that Jesus was dead. Even the members of the radical Jesus Seminar, which was popular in the 1990s, accepted the death of Jesus. This is why John Dominic Crossan said that the death of Jesus by crucifixion “is as sure as anything historical can ever be.”In accordance with Jewish burial customs, the body of Jesus was then wrapped in a linen cloth. About seventy-five pounds of aromatic spices, mixed together to form a gummy substance, were applied to the wrappings around the body (see John 19:39-40). After the body was placed in a solid rock tomb, an extremely large stone, weighing approximately two tons, was rolled by means of levers against the entrance (see Matthew 27:60).<br />
<br />
<strong>What Do You Think?</strong><br />
Have you ever seen any movies about Jesus’ life that included his death and resurrection, such as The Passion of the Christ?What went through your mind when you saw the torture and crucifixion of Christ?Do you think he deserved what happened to him?A Roman guard of strictly disciplined men was stationed to watch the tomb. Fear of punishment among these men “produced flawless attention to duty, especially in the night watches.” This guard affixed on the tomb the Roman seal, a stamp of Roman power and authority. The seal was meant to prevent vandalizing. Anyone trying to move the stone from the tomb’s entrance would have broken the seal and thus incurred the wrath of Roman law.<br />
<br />
<strong>Yet in spite of the guard and the seal, the tomb was empty.The Empty Tomb</strong><br />
<br />
The followers of Jesus claimed he had risen from the dead. They reported that he appeared to them over a period of forty days, showing himself to them by many convincing proofs (some versions of the Bible say “infallible proofs”; see, for example, ACTS 1:3, NKJV). The apostle Paul said that Jesus appeared to more than five hundred of his followers at one time, the majority of whom were still alive and could confirm what he wrote (see 1 Corinthians 15:3-8).Arthur Michael Ramsey, former archbishop of Canterbury, writes: “I believe in the Resurrection, partly because a series of facts are unaccountable without it.” The empty tomb was “too notorious to be denied.” German theologian Paul Althaus states that the claim of the Resurrection “could not have been maintained in Jerusalem for a single day, for a single hour, if the emptiness of the tomb had not been established as a fact for all concerned.”Paul L. Maier concludes:If all the evidence is weighed carefully and fairly, it is indeed justifiable, according to the canons of historical research, to conclude that [Jesus’ tomb] was actually empty. . . . And no shred of evidence has yet been discovered in literary sources, epigraphy, or archaeology that would disprove this statement.How can we explain the empty tomb?Based on overwhelming historical evidence, Christians believe that Jesus was bodily resurrected in real time and space by the supernatural power of God. The difficulties in belief may be great, but the problems inherent in disbelief are even greater.The situation at the tomb after the Resurrection is significant. The Roman seal was broken, which meant automatic crucifixion upside down for whoever broke it. The massive stone was moved not just from the entrance but from the entire sepulcher, looking as if it had been picked up and carried away. The guard unit had fled. Byzantine Roman emperor Justinian in his Digest 49:16 lists eighteen offenses for which a Roman guard unit could be put to death. These included falling asleep or leaving one’s position unguarded.<br />
<br />
<strong>What Do You Think?</strong><br />
Have you ever been part of a group and something happened that involved all of you?<br />
Were your stories the same?<br />
How difficult is it to get everyone to tell the exact same story?<br />
The women came and found the tomb empty. They panicked and went back to tell the men. Peter and John ran to the tomb. John arrived first, but he didn’t enter. He looked inside and saw the graveclothes, caved in a little, but empty. The body of Christ had passed right through them into a new existence. Let’s face it; a sight like that would make anyone a believer.<br />
<strong>Alternative Theories to the Resurrection</strong><br />
Many people have advanced alternate theories to explain the Resurrection, but the theories are so contrived and illogical when compared with the claims of Christianity that their very weakness actually helps build confidence in the truth of the Resurrection.<br />
<br />
<strong>The Wrong-Tomb Theory</strong>A theory propounded by British biblical scholar Kirsopp Lake assumes that the women who reported the body missing had mistakenly gone to the wrong tomb that morning. If so, then the disciples who went to check the women’s story must have gone to the wrong tomb as well. We can be certain, however, that the Jewish authorities, who had asked for that Roman guard to be stationed at the tomb to prevent the body from being stolen, would not have been mistaken about the location. The Roman guards would also not have been mistaken, for they were there. If a wrong tomb were involved, the Jewish authorities would have lost no time in producing the body from the proper tomb, thus effectively quenching for all time any rumor of a resurrection.<br />
<br />
<strong>The Hallucination Theory</strong><br />
Another attempted explanation claims that the appearances of Jesus after the Resurrection were either illusions or hallucinations. This theory runs counter to psychological principles governing the occurrence of hallucinations. It is not credible to think that five hundred people could have seen the same hallucination for forty days. Also the hallucination theory does not coincide with the historical situation or the mental state of the apostles.So, where was the actual body of Jesus, and why didn’t those who opposed him produce it?<br />
<br />
<strong>The Swoon Theory</strong><br />
Nineteenth-century German rationalist Karl Venturini popularized the swoon theory several centuries ago, and it is often suggested even today. It claims that Jesus didn’t really die; he merely fainted from exhaustion and loss of blood. Everyone thought he was dead, but later he was resuscitated, and the disciples thought it to be a resurrection.German theologian David Friedrich Strauss, himself no believer in the Resurrection, deals a deathblow to any thought that Jesus could have revived from a swoon:It is impossible that a being who had stolen half-dead out of the sepulcher, who crept about weak and ill, wanting medical treatment, who required bandaging, strengthening and indulgence, and who still at last yielded to his sufferings, could have given to the disciples the impression that he was a Conqueror over death and the grave, the Prince of Life, an impression which lay at the bottom of their future ministry. Such a resuscitation could only have weakened the impression which He had made upon them in life and in death, at the most could only have given it an elegiac voice, but could by no possibility have changed their sorrow into enthusiasm, have elevated their reverence into worship.<br />
<br />
<strong>The Stolen-Body Theory</strong><br />
Another theory maintains that the disciples stole the body of Jesus while the guards slept. The depression and cowardice of the disciples make a hard-hitting argument against it. Can we imagine that they suddenly became so brave and daring as to face a detachment of select soldiers at the tomb and steal the body? They were in no mood to attempt anything like that.Commenting on the proposition that the disciples stole Christ’s body, J. N. D. Anderson says:This would run totally contrary to all we know of them: their ethical teaching, the quality of their lives, their steadfastness in suffering and persecution. Nor would it begin to explain their dramatic transformation from dejected and dispirited escapists into witnesses whom no opposition could muzzle.<br />
<br />
<strong>The Moved-Body Theory</strong><br />
Another theory says that the Roman or Jewish authorities moved Christ’s body from the tomb. This explanation is no more reasonable than the stolen-body theory. If the authorities had the body in their possession or knew where it was, why didn’t they explain that they had taken it, thus putting to an effective end the disciples’ preaching of the Resurrection in Jerusalem? If the authorities had taken the body, why didn’t they explain exactly where they had put it? Why didn’t they recover the corpse, display it on a cart, and wheel it through the center of Jerusalem? Such an action would have utterly destroyed Christianity.John Warwick Montgomery comments:It passes the bounds of credibility that the early Christians could have manufactured such a tale and then preached it among those who might easily have refuted it simply by producing the body of Jesus.<br />
<strong>The Relocated-Body Theory</strong><br />
In <strong><em>The Empty Tomb</em></strong>, Jeffrey Jay Lowder describes an interesting hypothesis, namely, that the body of Jesus was temporarily stored in the tomb of Joseph of Arimathea on Friday night before being relocated to a criminal’s tomb. The tomb of Jesus was empty not because he resurrected, but because the body was simply relocated. Thus, the disciples mistakenly believed he was resurrected. This hypothesis has gained a considerable following on the Internet.The “relocation hypothesis” gains support from the fact that reburial was common in ancient Palestine. But it’s important to note that the reburial procedures of the Jews differed significantly from the theory proposed here. The Jewish tradition was to bury a body for one year, and then after the flesh deteriorated and only bones remained, they would remove the bones and place them in an ossuary.The problem for the relocation of the body of Jesus is the complete lack of historical support, either in biblical or non-biblical sources. None of the New Testament Gospel accounts suggest that the body of Jesus was reburied. Mark 16:6, where the young man at the tomb says, “He isn’t here! He is risen from the dead!” undermines this view.The relocation hypothesis actually faces a more significant problem. Dr. Michael Licona observesAt best, even if the reburial hypothesis were true, all it accounts for is the empty tomb. And interestingly, the empty tomb didn’t convince any of the disciples—possibly with the exception of John—that Jesus had returned from the dead. It was the appearances of Jesus that convinced them, and the reburial theory can’t account for these.If the body of Jesus was simply relocated, why didn’t a relative uncover the body when the disciples began proclaiming the resurrection? Why wouldn’t an authority produce the body and stop Christianity in its tracks? Some have suggested that by this time the body of Jesus would be unrecognizable, but given the climate of Palestine, the body would have been recognizable for a considerable amount of time.<br />
<br />
<strong>What Do You Think?</strong><br />
Can you think of any other possible naturalistic explanations for Jesus’ resurrection?Does any other theory explain as many facts surrounding the events as his actual resurrection?<br />
<strong>The Copycat Theory</strong><br />
“Nothing in Christianity is original” is one of the most commonly used lines of many critics today. In the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries many scholars believed that the central claims of Christianity were plagiarized from Greco-Roman mystery religions. Jesus was considered another “dying and rising” god in the tradition of Osiris, Mithras, Adonis, and Dionysus. While this theory has experienced a surprising resurgence on the Internet and in popular books, it faces near universal rejection by contemporary scholars. Here’s why.While parallels between Jesus and the mystery religions may appear striking on the surface, they collapse under scrutiny. Osiris, for instance, is considered by many to be a dying and rising god from ancient Egypt. According to the myth, Osiris was killed by Seth and resuscitated by Isis. But rather than returning to the world in a resurrected body, Osiris became king of the underworld—hardly a parallel to the historical resurrection of Jesus. This is why Paul Rhodes Eddy and Greg Boyd, authors of The Jesus Legend, conclude that “the differences between Christianity and the mystery religions are far more profound than any similarities. While there certainly are parallel terms used in early Christianity and the mystery religions, there is little evidence for parallel concepts.”Unlike the historical Jesus, there is no evidence for the reliability of any of the alleged parallel stories in the mystery religions. Jesus of Nazareth ate, slept, performed miracles, died, and returned to life. These accounts are supported by a reliable historical record. In contrast, the dying and rising gods of the mystery religions were timeless myths repeated annually with the changing seasons.The most recent scholarly treatise on dying and rising gods was written by T. N. D. Mettinger, professor at Lund University.<br />
<br />
In <strong><em>The Riddle of Resurrection</em></strong>, Mettinger grants the existence of the myths of dying and rising gods in the ancient world, which, he admits, is a minority view. Yet his conclusion puts the nail in the coffin of the copycat theory:There is, as far as I am aware, no prima facie evidence that the death and resurrection of Jesus is a mythological construct, drawing on the myths and rites of the dying and rising gods of the surrounding world. While studied with profit against the background of Jewish resurrection belief, the faith in the death and resurrection of Jesus retains its unique character in the history of religions. The riddle remains.<br />
<br />
<strong>Evidence for the Resurrection</strong><br />
Professor Thomas Arnold, author of a famous three-volume History of Rome and the chair of modern history at Oxford, was well acquainted with the value of evidence in determining historical facts. He says:I have been used for many years to study the histories of other times, and to examine and weigh the evidence of those who have written about them, and I know of no one fact in the history of mankind which is proved by better and fuller evidence of every sort, to the understanding of a fair inquirer, than the great sign which God has given us that Christ died and rose again from the dead.British scholar Brooke Foss Westcott, who was a divinity professor at Cambridge University, says:Taking all the evidence together, it is not too much to say that there is no historic incident better or more variously supported than the resurrection of Christ. Nothing but the antecedent assumption that it must be false could have suggested the idea of deficiency in the proof of it.<br />
<br />
Dr. William Lane Craig concludes that “when you . . . [use] the ordinary canons of historical assessment, the best explanation for the facts is that God raised Jesus from the dead.”Simon Greenleaf was one of the greatest legal minds America has produced. He was the famous Royall Professor of Law at Harvard University and succeeded Justice Joseph Story as the Dane Professor of Law in the same university. While at Harvard, Greenleaf wrote a volume in which he examines the legal value of the apostles’ testimony to the resurrection of Christ. He observes that it is impossible that the apostles “could have persisted in affirming the truths they had narrated, had not Jesus actually risen from the dead, and had they not known this fact as certainly as they knew any other fact.” Greenleaf concludes that the resurrection of Christ is one of the best-supported events in history according to the laws of legal evidence administered in courts of justice.Sir Lionel Luckhoo is considered by many to be the world’s most successful attorney after 245 consecutive murder acquittals. This brilliant lawyer rigorously analyzed the historical facts of Christ’s resurrection and finally declares, “I say unequivocally that the evidence for the resurrection of Jesus Christ is so overwhelming that it compels acceptance by proof which leaves absolutely no room for doubt.”Frank Morison, another British lawyer, set out to refute the evidence for the Resurrection.<br />
<br />
He thought the life of Jesus was one of the most beautiful ever lived, but when it came to the Resurrection, Morison assumed someone had come along and tacked a myth onto the story. He planned to write an account of the last few days of Jesus, disregarding the Resurrection. The lawyer figured that an intelligent, rational approach to the story would completely discount such an event. However, when he applied his legal training to the facts, he had to change his mind. Instead of a refutation of the Resurrection, he eventually wrote the best seller Who Moved the Stone? He titled the first chapter “The Book That Refused to Be Written.” The rest of the book confirms decisively the validity of the evidence for Christ’s resurrection.<br />
<br />
George Eldon Ladd concludes: “The only rational explanation for these historical facts is that God raised Jesus in bodily form.” Believers in Jesus Christ today can have complete confidence, as did the first Christians, that their faith is based not on myth or legend but on the solid historical fact of the risen Christ and the empty tomb.Gary Habermas, a distinguished professor and chairman of the department of philosophy and theology at Liberty University, debated former atheist and leading scholar Antony Flew on the issue “Did Jesus Rise from the Dead?” A professional debate judge who was asked to evaluate the debate concludes,The historical evidence, though flawed, is strong enough to lead reasonable minds to conclude that Christ did indeed rise from the dead. . . . Habermas does end up providing “highly probably evidence” for the historicity of the resurrection “with no plausible naturalistic evidence against it.”Most important of all, individual believers can experience the power of the risen Christ in their lives today. First of all, they can know that their sins are forgiven (see Luke 24:46-47; 1 Corinthians 15:3). Second, they can be assured of eternal life and their own resurrection from the grave (see 1 Corinthians 15:19-26). Third, they can be released from a meaningless and empty life and be transformed into new creatures in Jesus Christ (see John 10:10; 2 Corinthians 5:17).<br />
<br />
<strong>What Do You Think?</strong><br />
<br />
Is the fact that Jesus rose from the dead 2,000 years ago relevant to you today? If so, how and why?What is your evaluation and decision?What do you think about the empty tomb?After examining the evidence from a judicial perspective, Lord Darling, former chief justice of England, concludes that “there exists such overwhelming evidence, positive and negative, factual and circumstantial, that no intelligent jury in the world could fail to bring in a verdict that the resurrection story is true.”_______________________<br />
<br />
Note from Bob:If after reading reading the <strong>Evidence for the Resurrection</strong> you have come to the conclusion that: <strong>“Yes! It is True!”</strong> And if you have never placed your faith in Christ, but would like to now – I am delighted to share with you that you can receive Christ right now by faith through prayer. (Prayer is talking with God. God knows your heart and is not so concerned with your words as He is with the attitude of your heart.)The following is a suggested prayer: <strong><em>Lord Jesus, I need You. Thank You for dying on the cross for my sins. I open the door of my life and receive You as my Savior and Lord. Thank You for forgiving my sins and giving me eternal life. Take control of the throne of my life. Make me the kind of person You want me to be. Amen!</em>Does this prayer express the desire of your heart?</strong> <br />
<br />
If “Yes” you can pray this prayer right now, and Christ will come into your life, as He promised.If you just prayed to ask Jesus to come into your heart – Welcome to God’s Eternal Family! This is the beginning of a new relationship with the God of all creation. You will want to find out how you can now grow in your relationship with Jesus by clicking this link: <strong> <a href="https://leadingwithquestions.us3.list-manage.com/track/click?u=4320a50bc672b2862b6f985c0&id=9d2605179f&e=df0aac804c" rel="noreferrer noopener" style="color: rgb(72, 184, 141); opacity: 1; text-decoration-line: none;" target="_blank">Yes, I just asked Jesus into my life…</a></strong>If you are still giving careful thought as to what you will do with Jesus and need to ask some questions before proceeding then you will want to click this link: <strong><a href="https://leadingwithquestions.us3.list-manage.com/track/click?u=4320a50bc672b2862b6f985c0&id=7ebc209000&e=df0aac804c" rel="noreferrer noopener" style="color: rgb(72, 184, 141); opacity: 1; text-decoration-line: none;" target="_blank">I may want to ask Jesus into my life, but I have a question I would like answered first</a>.This story did not touch my life until the fall of 1967 when I was a freshman at the University of South Dakota – home of the Coyotes! You can read my story <a href="https://leadingwithquestions.us3.list-manage.com/track/click?u=4320a50bc672b2862b6f985c0&id=a307d81275&e=df0aac804c" rel="noreferrer noopener" style="color: rgb(72, 184, 141); opacity: 1; text-decoration-line: none;" target="_blank">“3 Questions That Changed My Life”</a> by clicking <a href="https://leadingwithquestions.us3.list-manage.com/track/click?u=4320a50bc672b2862b6f985c0&id=03c10d7917&e=df0aac804c" rel="noreferrer noopener" style="color: rgb(72, 184, 141); opacity: 1; text-decoration-line: none;" target="_blank">“HERE”</a>.</strong></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table style="width:740px">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><img alt="" src="https://mcusercontent.com/4320a50bc672b2862b6f985c0/images/dd0c2337-5d8b-4c4a-b646-5545d6561feb.jpg" style="height:auto; width:734px" /><strong>Recommendation: This Easter Weekend might be the perfect time for you and your family to view <a href="https://leadingwithquestions.us3.list-manage.com/track/click?u=4320a50bc672b2862b6f985c0&id=02306ef825&e=df0aac804c" rel="noreferrer noopener" style="color: rgb(72, 184, 141); opacity: 1; text-decoration-line: none;" target="_blank">The Jesus Film</a> – the most translated movie in history – available in over 1800 languages. Click <a href="https://leadingwithquestions.us3.list-manage.com/track/click?u=4320a50bc672b2862b6f985c0&id=f50b259f63&e=df0aac804c" rel="noreferrer noopener" style="color: rgb(72, 184, 141); opacity: 1; text-decoration-line: none;" target="_blank">“HERE”</a> to download/view in English. (Once there – near the bottom you will find a link that will lead you to all 1800 plus languages)</strong></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table style="width:740px">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><img alt="" src="https://mcusercontent.com/4320a50bc672b2862b6f985c0/images/a8a6b533-e84c-4b78-bc58-9cbd19f00e22.jpg" style="height:auto; width:734px" /><strong>Offer: If you are not sure who Jesus really is or would like to know more about him, I would also be delighted to send you, as my gift, one of my favorite books, <em>More than a Carpenter </em>by Josh McDowell, my former colleague of 24 years and his son Sean.</strong></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table style="width:740px">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><strong>Josh, a former skeptic, is joined by Sean as they examine the evidence about Jesus. Is He really the Lord He claimed to be? How can we know for sure? <em>More than a Carpenter</em> investigates hard questions about the reliability of biblical records, the resurrection and the relationship between faith and science. They also address questions raised by today’s popular atheistic writers. You have already read chapter 10 above.</strong><strong>Please email me @ <a href="mailto:bob.tiede@cru.org" rel="noreferrer noopener" style="color: rgb(72, 184, 141); opacity: 1; text-decoration-line: none;" target="_blank">bob.tiede@cru.org</a> with your mailing address and your complimentary book will soon be on its way. (offer available for U.S.A. addresses only). If you live outside the U.S.A the “Kindle Edition” is available on Amazon for $2.88 by clicking <a href="https://leadingwithquestions.us3.list-manage.com/track/click?u=4320a50bc672b2862b6f985c0&id=964a256166&e=df0aac804c" rel="noreferrer noopener" style="color: rgb(72, 184, 141); opacity: 1; text-decoration-line: none;" target="_blank">“HERE.”</a></strong><br />
<br />
<strong>Happy Easter! </strong><strong> He is Risen! </strong><strong> He is Risen Indeed!</strong></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table style="width:740px">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td> </td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table style="width:740px">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td> </td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
',
'image' => '469risen.jpg',
'user_id' => '70',
'created' => '2021-04-02 02:47:25',
'modified' => '2021-04-02 02:47:25',
'publish_date' => '0000-00-00 00:00:00',
'publish' => '1',
'meta_title' => '',
'meta_key' => '',
'meta_desc' => '',
'hits' => '0',
'display_order' => '0'
),
'User' => array(
'username' => 'admin'
),
'Comment' => array()
)
$blog_id = '230'
$comments = array()
$commentTime = array()
compact - [internal], line ??
BlogsController::show_blog_detail() - APP/Controller/BlogsController.php, line 467
ReflectionMethod::invokeArgs() - [internal], line ??
Controller::invokeAction() - CORE/Cake/Controller/Controller.php, line 499
Dispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/Cake/Routing/Dispatcher.php, line 193
Dispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/Cake/Routing/Dispatcher.php, line 167
[main] - APP/webroot/index.php, line 117
Warning (2): Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /www/htdocs/w01e76ff/c-partnershiptest.org/lib/Cake/Utility/Debugger.php:797) [CORE/Cake/Network/CakeResponse.php, line 458]
setcookie - [internal], line ??
CakeResponse::_setCookies() - CORE/Cake/Network/CakeResponse.php, line 458
CakeResponse::send() - CORE/Cake/Network/CakeResponse.php, line 429
Dispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/Cake/Routing/Dispatcher.php, line 174
[main] - APP/webroot/index.php, line 117
MatchingTest:
Blogs About Us,What We Do For You,Be Memorable,God Loves You ,Testing pages_16,Terms and Conditions,imprint,Privacy Policy,Notice to the Right of Cancellation,Data Protection
Today I would like to share with you the newsletter which I received yesterday from my good friend Bob Tiede. Thank you Bob for sharing this great message!
Be blessed, your Christian Pälchen
A Note From Bob:
Tomorrow is Good Friday – the day over 2000 years ago when Jesus – falsely accused – was sentenced to the most cruel death ever invented – death by crucifixion on a cross! That day Jesus paid the penalty for the sins of every woman and man who had or would ever live. After he died he was taken down from that cross and laid in a borrowed grave through the generosity of a friend. The day after the Sabbath – on the first day of the week – 3 women came to his tomb to anoint his body and they found the stone that had covered his tomb rolled away and the tomb was empty. An angel appeared to them and said, “He is not here – He is Risen!” That was of course the first Easter – the day that over 2 billion followers of Jesus will celebrate this coming Sunday.
Christianity Rests on the Resurrection of ChristThe Apostle Paul in I Corinthians, Chapter 15 wrote:“If Christ has not been raised, our preaching is useless and …. your faith is futile; you are still in your sins. If only for this life we have hope in Christ, we are of all people most to be pitied.”Christianity rests on the resurrection of Christ. If it is true then it changes everything! If it is not true then over 2 billion believers around the globe, including me, have bet their lives on a lie! And as the Apostle Paul wrote, “If Christ has not been raised…we are of all people most to be pitied.”Is there evidence for the Resurrection of Christ?
Josh McDowell, my colleague of 24 years and his son Sean McDowell have given me their kind permission to “Excerpt” from Chapter 10 of their book “More Than a Carpenter” which has been translated into 128 languages with over 27 million books printed: Chapter 10 – Can You Keep a Good Man Down?A student at the University of Uruguay asked me, “Professor McDowell, why couldn’t you find some way to refute Christianity?”I answered, “For a very simple reason. I was unable to explain away the fact that the resurrection of Jesus Christ was a real event in history.”
After spending more than seven hundred hours studying this subject and thoroughly investigating its foundation, I came to the conclusion that the resurrection of Jesus Christ is either one of the most wicked, vicious, heartless hoaxes ever foisted on humanity, or it is the most important fact in history.The Resurrection takes the question “Is Christianity valid?” out of the realm of philosophy and makes it a question of history.
Does Christianity have a solid historical basis?Is sufficient evidence available to warrant belief in the Resurrection?Here are some of the issues and claims relevant to the question: Jesus of Nazareth, a Jewish prophet who claimed to be the Christ prophesied in the Jewish Scriptures, was arrested, judged to be a political criminal, and crucified. Three days after his death and burial, some women who went to his tomb found the body to be missing. Christ’s disciples claimed that God had raised him from the dead and that he had appeared to them many times before ascending to heaven.From this foundation, Christianity spread throughout the Roman Empire and has continued to exert great influence throughout the world through all subsequent centuries.
The big question is, Did the Resurrection actually happen?The Death and Burial of Jesus
After Jesus was condemned to death, he was stripped of his clothing and was whipped, according to Roman custom, before crucifixion.Alexander Metherell, who holds a medical degree from the University of Miami and a doctorate in engineering from the University of Bristol in England, made a detailed examination of Christ’s whipping at the hands of the Romans. He explains the process:The soldier would use a whip of braided leather thongs with metal balls woven into them. When the whip would strike the flesh, these balls would cause deep bruises or contusions, which would break open with further blows. And the whip had pieces of sharp bone as well, which would cut the flesh severely.The back would be so shredded that part of the spine was sometimes exposed by the deep, deep cuts. The whipping would have gone all the way from the shoulders down to the back, the buttocks, and the back of the legs. It was just terrible.One physician who has studied Roman beatings said, “As the flogging continued, the lacerations would tear into the underlying skeletal muscles and produce quivering ribbons of bleeding flesh.” A third-century historian by the name of Eusebius described flogging by saying, “The sufferer’s veins were laid bare, and the very muscles, sinews, and bowels of the victim were open to exposure.”We know that many people would die from this kind of beating even before they could be crucified. At the least, the victim would experience tremendous pain and go into hypovolemic shock.Given the brutality of the whipping, as well as his subsequent crucifixion, it is historically certain that Jesus was dead. Even the members of the radical Jesus Seminar, which was popular in the 1990s, accepted the death of Jesus. This is why John Dominic Crossan said that the death of Jesus by crucifixion “is as sure as anything historical can ever be.”In accordance with Jewish burial customs, the body of Jesus was then wrapped in a linen cloth. About seventy-five pounds of aromatic spices, mixed together to form a gummy substance, were applied to the wrappings around the body (see John 19:39-40). After the body was placed in a solid rock tomb, an extremely large stone, weighing approximately two tons, was rolled by means of levers against the entrance (see Matthew 27:60).
What Do You Think?
Have you ever seen any movies about Jesus’ life that included his death and resurrection, such as The Passion of the Christ?What went through your mind when you saw the torture and crucifixion of Christ?Do you think he deserved what happened to him?A Roman guard of strictly disciplined men was stationed to watch the tomb. Fear of punishment among these men “produced flawless attention to duty, especially in the night watches.” This guard affixed on the tomb the Roman seal, a stamp of Roman power and authority. The seal was meant to prevent vandalizing. Anyone trying to move the stone from the tomb’s entrance would have broken the seal and thus incurred the wrath of Roman law.
Yet in spite of the guard and the seal, the tomb was empty.The Empty Tomb
The followers of Jesus claimed he had risen from the dead. They reported that he appeared to them over a period of forty days, showing himself to them by many convincing proofs (some versions of the Bible say “infallible proofs”; see, for example, ACTS 1:3, NKJV). The apostle Paul said that Jesus appeared to more than five hundred of his followers at one time, the majority of whom were still alive and could confirm what he wrote (see 1 Corinthians 15:3-8).Arthur Michael Ramsey, former archbishop of Canterbury, writes: “I believe in the Resurrection, partly because a series of facts are unaccountable without it.” The empty tomb was “too notorious to be denied.” German theologian Paul Althaus states that the claim of the Resurrection “could not have been maintained in Jerusalem for a single day, for a single hour, if the emptiness of the tomb had not been established as a fact for all concerned.”Paul L. Maier concludes:If all the evidence is weighed carefully and fairly, it is indeed justifiable, according to the canons of historical research, to conclude that [Jesus’ tomb] was actually empty. . . . And no shred of evidence has yet been discovered in literary sources, epigraphy, or archaeology that would disprove this statement.How can we explain the empty tomb?Based on overwhelming historical evidence, Christians believe that Jesus was bodily resurrected in real time and space by the supernatural power of God. The difficulties in belief may be great, but the problems inherent in disbelief are even greater.The situation at the tomb after the Resurrection is significant. The Roman seal was broken, which meant automatic crucifixion upside down for whoever broke it. The massive stone was moved not just from the entrance but from the entire sepulcher, looking as if it had been picked up and carried away. The guard unit had fled. Byzantine Roman emperor Justinian in his Digest 49:16 lists eighteen offenses for which a Roman guard unit could be put to death. These included falling asleep or leaving one’s position unguarded.
What Do You Think?
Have you ever been part of a group and something happened that involved all of you?
Were your stories the same?
How difficult is it to get everyone to tell the exact same story?
The women came and found the tomb empty. They panicked and went back to tell the men. Peter and John ran to the tomb. John arrived first, but he didn’t enter. He looked inside and saw the graveclothes, caved in a little, but empty. The body of Christ had passed right through them into a new existence. Let’s face it; a sight like that would make anyone a believer. Alternative Theories to the Resurrection
Many people have advanced alternate theories to explain the Resurrection, but the theories are so contrived and illogical when compared with the claims of Christianity that their very weakness actually helps build confidence in the truth of the Resurrection.
The Wrong-Tomb TheoryA theory propounded by British biblical scholar Kirsopp Lake assumes that the women who reported the body missing had mistakenly gone to the wrong tomb that morning. If so, then the disciples who went to check the women’s story must have gone to the wrong tomb as well. We can be certain, however, that the Jewish authorities, who had asked for that Roman guard to be stationed at the tomb to prevent the body from being stolen, would not have been mistaken about the location. The Roman guards would also not have been mistaken, for they were there. If a wrong tomb were involved, the Jewish authorities would have lost no time in producing the body from the proper tomb, thus effectively quenching for all time any rumor of a resurrection.
The Hallucination Theory
Another attempted explanation claims that the appearances of Jesus after the Resurrection were either illusions or hallucinations. This theory runs counter to psychological principles governing the occurrence of hallucinations. It is not credible to think that five hundred people could have seen the same hallucination for forty days. Also the hallucination theory does not coincide with the historical situation or the mental state of the apostles.So, where was the actual body of Jesus, and why didn’t those who opposed him produce it?
The Swoon Theory
Nineteenth-century German rationalist Karl Venturini popularized the swoon theory several centuries ago, and it is often suggested even today. It claims that Jesus didn’t really die; he merely fainted from exhaustion and loss of blood. Everyone thought he was dead, but later he was resuscitated, and the disciples thought it to be a resurrection.German theologian David Friedrich Strauss, himself no believer in the Resurrection, deals a deathblow to any thought that Jesus could have revived from a swoon:It is impossible that a being who had stolen half-dead out of the sepulcher, who crept about weak and ill, wanting medical treatment, who required bandaging, strengthening and indulgence, and who still at last yielded to his sufferings, could have given to the disciples the impression that he was a Conqueror over death and the grave, the Prince of Life, an impression which lay at the bottom of their future ministry. Such a resuscitation could only have weakened the impression which He had made upon them in life and in death, at the most could only have given it an elegiac voice, but could by no possibility have changed their sorrow into enthusiasm, have elevated their reverence into worship.
The Stolen-Body Theory
Another theory maintains that the disciples stole the body of Jesus while the guards slept. The depression and cowardice of the disciples make a hard-hitting argument against it. Can we imagine that they suddenly became so brave and daring as to face a detachment of select soldiers at the tomb and steal the body? They were in no mood to attempt anything like that.Commenting on the proposition that the disciples stole Christ’s body, J. N. D. Anderson says:This would run totally contrary to all we know of them: their ethical teaching, the quality of their lives, their steadfastness in suffering and persecution. Nor would it begin to explain their dramatic transformation from dejected and dispirited escapists into witnesses whom no opposition could muzzle.
The Moved-Body Theory
Another theory says that the Roman or Jewish authorities moved Christ’s body from the tomb. This explanation is no more reasonable than the stolen-body theory. If the authorities had the body in their possession or knew where it was, why didn’t they explain that they had taken it, thus putting to an effective end the disciples’ preaching of the Resurrection in Jerusalem? If the authorities had taken the body, why didn’t they explain exactly where they had put it? Why didn’t they recover the corpse, display it on a cart, and wheel it through the center of Jerusalem? Such an action would have utterly destroyed Christianity.John Warwick Montgomery comments:It passes the bounds of credibility that the early Christians could have manufactured such a tale and then preached it among those who might easily have refuted it simply by producing the body of Jesus. The Relocated-Body Theory
In The Empty Tomb, Jeffrey Jay Lowder describes an interesting hypothesis, namely, that the body of Jesus was temporarily stored in the tomb of Joseph of Arimathea on Friday night before being relocated to a criminal’s tomb. The tomb of Jesus was empty not because he resurrected, but because the body was simply relocated. Thus, the disciples mistakenly believed he was resurrected. This hypothesis has gained a considerable following on the Internet.The “relocation hypothesis” gains support from the fact that reburial was common in ancient Palestine. But it’s important to note that the reburial procedures of the Jews differed significantly from the theory proposed here. The Jewish tradition was to bury a body for one year, and then after the flesh deteriorated and only bones remained, they would remove the bones and place them in an ossuary.The problem for the relocation of the body of Jesus is the complete lack of historical support, either in biblical or non-biblical sources. None of the New Testament Gospel accounts suggest that the body of Jesus was reburied. Mark 16:6, where the young man at the tomb says, “He isn’t here! He is risen from the dead!” undermines this view.The relocation hypothesis actually faces a more significant problem. Dr. Michael Licona observesAt best, even if the reburial hypothesis were true, all it accounts for is the empty tomb. And interestingly, the empty tomb didn’t convince any of the disciples—possibly with the exception of John—that Jesus had returned from the dead. It was the appearances of Jesus that convinced them, and the reburial theory can’t account for these.If the body of Jesus was simply relocated, why didn’t a relative uncover the body when the disciples began proclaiming the resurrection? Why wouldn’t an authority produce the body and stop Christianity in its tracks? Some have suggested that by this time the body of Jesus would be unrecognizable, but given the climate of Palestine, the body would have been recognizable for a considerable amount of time.
What Do You Think?
Can you think of any other possible naturalistic explanations for Jesus’ resurrection?Does any other theory explain as many facts surrounding the events as his actual resurrection? The Copycat Theory
“Nothing in Christianity is original” is one of the most commonly used lines of many critics today. In the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries many scholars believed that the central claims of Christianity were plagiarized from Greco-Roman mystery religions. Jesus was considered another “dying and rising” god in the tradition of Osiris, Mithras, Adonis, and Dionysus. While this theory has experienced a surprising resurgence on the Internet and in popular books, it faces near universal rejection by contemporary scholars. Here’s why.While parallels between Jesus and the mystery religions may appear striking on the surface, they collapse under scrutiny. Osiris, for instance, is considered by many to be a dying and rising god from ancient Egypt. According to the myth, Osiris was killed by Seth and resuscitated by Isis. But rather than returning to the world in a resurrected body, Osiris became king of the underworld—hardly a parallel to the historical resurrection of Jesus. This is why Paul Rhodes Eddy and Greg Boyd, authors of The Jesus Legend, conclude that “the differences between Christianity and the mystery religions are far more profound than any similarities. While there certainly are parallel terms used in early Christianity and the mystery religions, there is little evidence for parallel concepts.”Unlike the historical Jesus, there is no evidence for the reliability of any of the alleged parallel stories in the mystery religions. Jesus of Nazareth ate, slept, performed miracles, died, and returned to life. These accounts are supported by a reliable historical record. In contrast, the dying and rising gods of the mystery religions were timeless myths repeated annually with the changing seasons.The most recent scholarly treatise on dying and rising gods was written by T. N. D. Mettinger, professor at Lund University.
In The Riddle of Resurrection, Mettinger grants the existence of the myths of dying and rising gods in the ancient world, which, he admits, is a minority view. Yet his conclusion puts the nail in the coffin of the copycat theory:There is, as far as I am aware, no prima facie evidence that the death and resurrection of Jesus is a mythological construct, drawing on the myths and rites of the dying and rising gods of the surrounding world. While studied with profit against the background of Jewish resurrection belief, the faith in the death and resurrection of Jesus retains its unique character in the history of religions. The riddle remains.
Evidence for the Resurrection
Professor Thomas Arnold, author of a famous three-volume History of Rome and the chair of modern history at Oxford, was well acquainted with the value of evidence in determining historical facts. He says:I have been used for many years to study the histories of other times, and to examine and weigh the evidence of those who have written about them, and I know of no one fact in the history of mankind which is proved by better and fuller evidence of every sort, to the understanding of a fair inquirer, than the great sign which God has given us that Christ died and rose again from the dead.British scholar Brooke Foss Westcott, who was a divinity professor at Cambridge University, says:Taking all the evidence together, it is not too much to say that there is no historic incident better or more variously supported than the resurrection of Christ. Nothing but the antecedent assumption that it must be false could have suggested the idea of deficiency in the proof of it.
Dr. William Lane Craig concludes that “when you . . . [use] the ordinary canons of historical assessment, the best explanation for the facts is that God raised Jesus from the dead.”Simon Greenleaf was one of the greatest legal minds America has produced. He was the famous Royall Professor of Law at Harvard University and succeeded Justice Joseph Story as the Dane Professor of Law in the same university. While at Harvard, Greenleaf wrote a volume in which he examines the legal value of the apostles’ testimony to the resurrection of Christ. He observes that it is impossible that the apostles “could have persisted in affirming the truths they had narrated, had not Jesus actually risen from the dead, and had they not known this fact as certainly as they knew any other fact.” Greenleaf concludes that the resurrection of Christ is one of the best-supported events in history according to the laws of legal evidence administered in courts of justice.Sir Lionel Luckhoo is considered by many to be the world’s most successful attorney after 245 consecutive murder acquittals. This brilliant lawyer rigorously analyzed the historical facts of Christ’s resurrection and finally declares, “I say unequivocally that the evidence for the resurrection of Jesus Christ is so overwhelming that it compels acceptance by proof which leaves absolutely no room for doubt.”Frank Morison, another British lawyer, set out to refute the evidence for the Resurrection.
He thought the life of Jesus was one of the most beautiful ever lived, but when it came to the Resurrection, Morison assumed someone had come along and tacked a myth onto the story. He planned to write an account of the last few days of Jesus, disregarding the Resurrection. The lawyer figured that an intelligent, rational approach to the story would completely discount such an event. However, when he applied his legal training to the facts, he had to change his mind. Instead of a refutation of the Resurrection, he eventually wrote the best seller Who Moved the Stone? He titled the first chapter “The Book That Refused to Be Written.” The rest of the book confirms decisively the validity of the evidence for Christ’s resurrection.
George Eldon Ladd concludes: “The only rational explanation for these historical facts is that God raised Jesus in bodily form.” Believers in Jesus Christ today can have complete confidence, as did the first Christians, that their faith is based not on myth or legend but on the solid historical fact of the risen Christ and the empty tomb.Gary Habermas, a distinguished professor and chairman of the department of philosophy and theology at Liberty University, debated former atheist and leading scholar Antony Flew on the issue “Did Jesus Rise from the Dead?” A professional debate judge who was asked to evaluate the debate concludes,The historical evidence, though flawed, is strong enough to lead reasonable minds to conclude that Christ did indeed rise from the dead. . . . Habermas does end up providing “highly probably evidence” for the historicity of the resurrection “with no plausible naturalistic evidence against it.”Most important of all, individual believers can experience the power of the risen Christ in their lives today. First of all, they can know that their sins are forgiven (see Luke 24:46-47; 1 Corinthians 15:3). Second, they can be assured of eternal life and their own resurrection from the grave (see 1 Corinthians 15:19-26). Third, they can be released from a meaningless and empty life and be transformed into new creatures in Jesus Christ (see John 10:10; 2 Corinthians 5:17).
What Do You Think?
Is the fact that Jesus rose from the dead 2,000 years ago relevant to you today? If so, how and why?What is your evaluation and decision?What do you think about the empty tomb?After examining the evidence from a judicial perspective, Lord Darling, former chief justice of England, concludes that “there exists such overwhelming evidence, positive and negative, factual and circumstantial, that no intelligent jury in the world could fail to bring in a verdict that the resurrection story is true.”_______________________
Note from Bob:If after reading reading the Evidence for the Resurrection you have come to the conclusion that: “Yes! It is True!” And if you have never placed your faith in Christ, but would like to now – I am delighted to share with you that you can receive Christ right now by faith through prayer. (Prayer is talking with God. God knows your heart and is not so concerned with your words as He is with the attitude of your heart.)The following is a suggested prayer: Lord Jesus, I need You. Thank You for dying on the cross for my sins. I open the door of my life and receive You as my Savior and Lord. Thank You for forgiving my sins and giving me eternal life. Take control of the throne of my life. Make me the kind of person You want me to be. Amen!Does this prayer express the desire of your heart?
If “Yes” you can pray this prayer right now, and Christ will come into your life, as He promised.If you just prayed to ask Jesus to come into your heart – Welcome to God’s Eternal Family! This is the beginning of a new relationship with the God of all creation. You will want to find out how you can now grow in your relationship with Jesus by clicking this link: Yes, I just asked Jesus into my life…If you are still giving careful thought as to what you will do with Jesus and need to ask some questions before proceeding then you will want to click this link: I may want to ask Jesus into my life, but I have a question I would like answered first.This story did not touch my life until the fall of 1967 when I was a freshman at the University of South Dakota – home of the Coyotes! You can read my story “3 Questions That Changed My Life” by clicking “HERE”.
Recommendation: This Easter Weekend might be the perfect time for you and your family to view The Jesus Film – the most translated movie in history – available in over 1800 languages. Click “HERE” to download/view in English. (Once there – near the bottom you will find a link that will lead you to all 1800 plus languages)
Offer: If you are not sure who Jesus really is or would like to know more about him, I would also be delighted to send you, as my gift, one of my favorite books, More than a Carpenter by Josh McDowell, my former colleague of 24 years and his son Sean.
Josh, a former skeptic, is joined by Sean as they examine the evidence about Jesus. Is He really the Lord He claimed to be? How can we know for sure? More than a Carpenter investigates hard questions about the reliability of biblical records, the resurrection and the relationship between faith and science. They also address questions raised by today’s popular atheistic writers. You have already read chapter 10 above.Please email me @ bob.tiede@cru.org with your mailing address and your complimentary book will soon be on its way. (offer available for U.S.A. addresses only). If you live outside the U.S.A the “Kindle Edition” is available on Amazon for $2.88 by clicking “HERE.”
Happy Easter! He is Risen! He is Risen Indeed!
Leave a comment
Comments
Terms and Conditions
General Terms and Conditions
§ 1 General
a) Area of Validity The following terms and conditions shall apply in the version valid at the time of signing the contract for all legal relationships between Mr. Christian Pälchen, Herminenstraße 6, 31675 Bückeburg (hereafter called: Fit for Family) and his customers. Conflicting General Terms and Conditions of the customers are hereby expressly rejected.
b) Contract Agreement Contract language is German. As far as English-language texts are used, they are only used to simplify communication. The German text version shall always override questions regarding interpretation or linguistic variations.
c) Registration To use the full content of this website, it is initially required to set up a customer account. Therefore, the necessary data is asked for, so Fit for Family can perform the services. The data input are confirmed by clicking the “Registration” button and setting the checkmark to acknowledge the General Terms and Conditions. The customer will then receive a confirmation email with the required Log-In data. Only when the customer initially logs in with these data at Fit for Family is the registration complete. The password which allows the customer access to the personal area is to be treated with strict confidentiality, and is not to be forwarded to third parties under any circumstances. The customer shall take the suitable and appropriate precautions and measures to prevent that third parties have knowledge of their password. A customer account cannot be transferred to other user/customers or other third parties. d) Booking of tests The description of the product line on Fit for Family’s website is subject to change and not binding. The order process on this website consists of a total of three (3) steps. In the first step, the client selects the desired merchandise. In the second step, the client enters their data including billing address and, if necessary, different delivery address, if not already specified in their customer account or -if payment with Paypal is chosen- in their PayPal account. If the customer chooses the payment option "PayPal", he is forwarded to the PayPal page. After entering his data on PayPal´s Website he is again forwarded to the Internet page of Fit for Family. In the third step, the client has the opportunity to double-check all data (i.e. name, address, ordered merchandise) and, if necessary, to correct data entry errors before they confirm their order by clicking the button “Purchase Now” (German: “zahlungspflichtig bestellen”/”legally binding purchase order”). This order signifies the customer’s legally binding contract offer. Fit for Family will confirm the receipt of the order immediately. The confirmation receipt does represent a legally binding acceptance of the order. This acceptance closes the contract between Fit for Family and its client. The contract’s text body shall be savedby Fit for Family, and shall be sent to the customer in writing (i.e. email or regular mail) in addition to the present General Terms and Conditions, and Customer Information. The contract’s text body cannot, however, be accessed by the customer via the seller’s Internet website after having submitting their order. The customer may print the applicable website’s page showing the contract’s text body through the browser’s Print function.
§ 2 Delivery and Services
a) Partial Shipments Fit for Family is entitled to make partial shipments when this is deemed acceptable to the customer. In the event of partial shipments, the customer shall, however, not incur any additional shipping cost.
b) Delays in delivery and services Delays in delivery and services based on acts of God/force majeure and extraordinary and non-foreseeable events, which even with extreme precaution by Fit for Family cannot be prevented (including especially: strikes, regulatory action or court orders, and instances of incorrect or improper delivery of goods to the seller despite the appropriate covering transaction to that effect), are not to be imputed to Fit for Family. They entitle Fit for Family to postpone delivery by the time period of the hindering circumstance.
c) Cancellation of Contract At non-availability, based on the above-mentioned reasons, Fit for Family may cancel the contract. Fit for Family commits to inform the customer without delay about the non-availability and shall reimburse any services already rendered in return.
d) Delivery Exclusion Post Office boxes will not be delivered.
e) Delay of Acceptance Should the customer be in delay of acceptance of the goods ordered, Fit for Family shall be entitled, after an appropriate grace period, to cancel the contract and file for damages due to delay or non-compliance. During the delay of acceptance, the customer carries the risk of accidental loss or accidental deterioration.
d) Time of Performance As far as it is not otherwise agreed upon, Fit for Family shall perform the service within seven (7) days. The commencement of the delivery period for prepayments is the day after submitting the payment order to the transmitting credit institution, or for cash on delivery or payment by invoice the day after close of contract. The period ends on the subsequent seventh day. Should the last day of this period be a Saturday, Sunday, or national holiday observed by the respective country of the delivery address, the period ends on the following business day.
§ 3 Seminars and Events
a) General Fit For Family offers seminars as well as events for singles and couples. Fit For Family is entitled to have a third party fulfill the contract in whole or in parts. Minor reasonable changes such as topics, order of topics and speakers are subject to change. b) Booking The booking process of the events and seminars offered shall takes place through offer and acceptance whereby the customer’s booking (e.g. by email, contact form through this website) facilitates the offer. As far as the booking does not take place by email but through the website, the order process consists of three (3) steps. In Step 1, the customer chooses desired Fit For Family’s offer package. In Step 2, the customer shall enter their data and has the possibility to double-check all data entered (e.g. name, address, payment method, desired seminar or event) and, if necessary, correct entry mistakes before the customer is transferred to PayPal by clicking the button “Send your booking”. After input of the required PayPal payment details to process payment, the order process finalized by clicking the button „Pay Now“. This entails a binding contract offer by the customer. Fit For Family shall confirm receipt of the customer’s booking immediately, as far as the order was received through the website. This receipt of booking does not constitute a legally binding acceptance of the booking.
Fit For Family is entitled to legally accept the customer’s contract offer made by the booking (by email or contact form) within one week after receipt of the booking in text form (e.g. by email, facsimile). The contract between Fit For Family and the customer comes into legal existence with the acceptance. As far as the booking takes place through the contact form, the text body is saved and stored by Fit For Family and is send to the customer after they send their order, together with the present General Terms and Conditions and the customer information in text form (e.g. email, facsimile or by regular mail). The contract text cannot be retrieved by the customer after sending their booking through Fit For Family’s internet site. As far as the close of contract did not take place through the website, the contract text will not be saved and stored separately.
c) Terms of Payment Seminar fees entitle to the participation of the booked seminar and are to be paid prior to the beginning of the seminar at the latest. The course admission as well as detailed seminar materials are included in the admission fee. The customer is responsible themselves for accommodations and meals, such are not included in the admission fee, as far as nothing to the contrary has been expressly agreed upon. If only parts of the seminar are attended, for which Fit For Family is not responsible for, missed hours/days cannot be repeated and are not to be deducted to reduce the admission fee. This also includes attendance and admission at booked events.
d) Cancellation through the customer Cancellation of the services booked by the customer is possible in writing (by email or regular mail). The right to cancel is not touched through this cancellation regulation; the right to cancel does not exist, however, in regards to contracts with additional services in connection with leisure activities, if the contract provides for performance on a specific date or during a specific period. The cancellation fees correspond with the following regulations, whereas the cancellation is free of charge, if it is received thirty (30) days prior to the agreed seminar or event begin, at the latest. The timely cancellation takes place when Fit For Family receives the cancellation notice. Upon later cancellation, the cancellation fees shall be as follows: 50 per cent of the agreed invoice amount, starting from the 29th to the 14th day of contract start 100 per cent of the agreed invoice amount for cancellation up to the point of less than 14 days before agreed seminar or event start
The customer has to provide proof that Fit For Family did not occur any cost or minor cost. Fit For Family will provide re-booking based upon availability instead of a cancellation whereby seminars or events booked through re-booking are no longer subject to cancellation by the customer.
e) Postponement of dates and cancellations by Fit For Family Fit For Family reserves the right to change dates, cancel seminars or events and/or locations up to seven (7) days prior to seminar or event start. All payments received for cancelled seminars or events will be reimbursed. Additional damages by the customer toward Fit For Family are not subject to legal recourse. The customer is required to make arrangements for such cancellation events regarding travel or hotel reservations (e. g. through purchase of a travel cancellation insurance.)
§ 4 Payment
a) Payment Terms Payment is made via PayPal.
b) Pricing All prices are final prices. Due to the small business status, we do not charge VAT. In addition are separated listed cost for Shipping & Handling, if pick up by the customer at Fit for Family’s office in Bückeburg is not arranged. c) Right of Retention The enforcement of a right of retention is only available to the customer for such counterclaims which are due and based on the same legal relationship as the customer’s obligation.
§ 5 Cancellation for Customers with Distance Contracts
The consumer has the right to cancel distance contracts, which can be taken from the separate Cancellation Policy with sample cancellation form.
§ 6 Warranty
a) Warranty claim There are legal warranty claims. A warranty claim may only be made concerning the condition of the merchandise; reasonable deviations in regards to aesthetic characteristics of the merchandise shall not come within the warranty claim. Should there be additional guarantees in addition to the warranty claims, you shall find their exact conditions with each product. Potential guarantees do not touch the warranty claims. Fit for Family does specifically not assume a guarantee for advice and courses given in books and instructions. Success is only owed to the transfer of products.
b) Transfer of risk Risk of accidental destruction or deterioration of merchandise ordered shall only be transferred upon the customer’s receipt of goods.
c) Notification Should the customer realize that they receive goods in damaged packaging or notice damage after receipt of the goods, Fit for Family asks that the customer informs the company. There shall neither be an obligation to such notification nor shall the customer’s warranty rights be affected by an omitted notification.
d) Subsequent performance Should the merchandise be defective, the customer may choose to require subsequent performance in form of subsequent repair or subsequent delivery. In the event that, even after two attempts, the defect could not be corrected, the customer may choose to cancel the purchase or reduce the price.
e) Rights regarding non-essential defects Should a non-essential defect exist, the customer shall be entitled only to the right of an appropriate reduction of the purchase price excluding the right to cancel.
f) Damages for defects Liability is not assumed for damage which may be based on the incorrect handling or use of the merchandise. Fit for Family shall only provide damages for the goods’ defects in the event of intent or gross negligence. This exclusion shall not be applied to liability for damage to loss of life, bodily injury or damage to the health of a person. Regulations of the German Product Liability Law shall also be untouched by the exclusion from liability.
g) Warranty towards business owners The following regulations apply towards business owners, apart from the statutory warranty regulations: in case of defect, Fit for Family shall provide subsequent performance, based on their own choice in form of defect removal or renewed delivery. The risk of accidental loss or deterioration of the goods already transfers to the person responsible for the transport. Warranty claims shall be subject to statutory limitation within one year after the pre-determined risk transfer. Exempt from this is the Right of Recourse according to § 478 BGB [German: BGB – Bürgerliches Gesetzbuch/German Civil Code]
h) Business owners’ duty to objection Business owners are obligated to immediately inform of obvious defects in writing: otherwise the validity of warranty claims shall be excluded. Timely mailing of the objection within the grace period shall suffice. The business owner shall produce proof in its entirety that all conditions for a claim have been met, especially the defect itself, the exact time of discovery of the defect and the timeliness of the objection regarding the defect.
§ 7 Liability
a) Liability exemptiondisclaimer Fit for Family, and its legal representatives and vicarious agents, shall only be liable for intent or gross negligence. As far as considerable contract duties (consequently such duties whose adherence are of necessary meaning for the attainment of contract purposes) are concerned, even slight negligence is covered. Liability is limited in this case to foreseeable, contract typical, immediate average damages. Towards business owners, Fit for Family shall only be liable in the case of a grossly negligent violation against insignificant contract duties only in the amount of the foreseeable, contract typical, immediate average damage.
b) Retention of Liability The aforementioned liability exemption disclaimer shall not concern liability for damage to loss of life, bodily injury or damage to the health of a person. Regulations of the German Product Liability Law shall also be untouched by the exclusion from liability.
§ 8 Final clause
a) Place of Jurisdiction It is agreed that the exclusive place of jurisdiction for all litigation proceedings based on this contract shall be the registered office of Fit for Family in Bückeburg, insofar as the customer is a merchant, legal entity under public law or special fund under public law, or insofar as the customer does not have a place of jurisdiction in the Federal Republic of Germany.
b) Governing Law Unless mandatory legal provisions based on the customer’s right of domicile do not prevent it, it shall be agreed upon that German law shall valid excluding the UN Convention on the International Sale of Goods.
c) Severability Clause Should individual terms of this contract become invalid or ineffective, it shall not infringe on the validity of the remaining General Terms and Conditions.
Data Protection
Data Protection Policy
§ 1 Personal Data
a) Personal Data
Personal data are data which disclose or can disclose the customer’s identity. The Christian Partnership Test adheres to the policy of data avoidance. As far as possible, collection of personal data is avoided.
b) Dealings
Personal data exclusively serve to initiate contracts, draft content, execute or process a contractual relationship. As a matter of principle, data are not forwarded to third parties. Data are only forwarded to the logistics company commissioned for the purpose of fulfilling the delivery order, as far as this is necessary for the delivery of the merchandise ordered. To process payments, the required payment data are forwarded to the financial institution commissioned to process payment and, if necessary, to the commissioned and selected payment service provider. Use of personally-related data only takes place to the extent that is necessary, or as far The Christian Partnership Test is legally or by court order required, or if necessary, to prohibit abuse against the General Terms and Conditions in a legitimate manner.
c) Objection
The customer can object to the storage of their personal data at any time. Data, which must be kept ready for the purpose of processing the contract, is exempt from this.
d) Right to Information
Upon request, The Christian Partnership Test shall inform the customer about the storage of their data.
e) Right to Correction, Deletion, and Blocking of Data
The customer has the right to correct, delete or block inaccurate personal data upon request at any time. The use of this right is free-of-charge and can simply be requested by filling out the contact form. As a matter of principle, this service is free-of-charge.
§ 2 User and Registration Data
To set up the Internet page, user and registration data are collected, processed, and used, as necessary. Customer data and IP address are registered with a time and date stamp in the log file, and used and saved for the purpose of this webpage’s statistical evaluation. User and registration data will not be merged with personal data.
§ 3 Data Security
a) Data Security
All data at www.c-partnershiptest.org are saved through technical and organizational measures against loss, destruction, access, modification, and distribution. The Christian Partnership Test does not, however, assume liability for the destruction and damage of data.
b) Sessions and Cookies
To operate the Internet site, The Christian Partnership Test may use cookies or server-based sessions to store data. Cookies are, for instance, used here for personalized greetings by using the member’s name. Cookies are files, which are stored by a website on the customer’s hard drive to automatically recognize this particular computer at the next visit to the website, and adjust the website based on the customer’s use. Cookies can also be rejected through the browser’s settings by deactivating the storage of cookies or by setting the browser in such a way that it informs about the changes upon transmission. The Christian Partnership Test ensures that data related to a person is not transferred from sessions or through cookies.
§ 4 Newsletter
If you subscribe to our newsletter, we will use the data you provided or separately transmitted data to regularly send you our newsletter. To unsubscribe from the newsletter is possible at any time and can either be made by sending a message through the contact options stated or by clicking the link in the newsletter for this purpose.
§ 5 Services by Third-Party Providers
Social Media Links
The Christian Partnership Test uses its own social media sites, made available on this website by clicking on the links of the third-party-providers to be reached. Through the use of these links, you will reach the respective Internet pages of the third-party-provider (e.g. Facebook, Twitter, Google+). As soon as you will have opened up the websites of the third-party-providers, you will have entered the respective third-party-provider’s area of responsibility, so that their data protection policy or their explanations of data usage are effective as well. The Christian Partnership Test does not have any influence over it; we recommend, however, that you log yourself out from the respective third-party-provider’s website prior to using the respective link in order to avoid an unnecessary forwarding of data, so that in certain instances user profiles will not be created by the third-party-provider through the use of the link. The Christian Partnership Test has deliberately only used links and avoided additional plug-ins by third-party-providers to protect your data.
§ 6 Contact information
The customer may contact The Christian Partnership Test at info@fitforfamily.org regarding data protection or by using the contact form.
Privacy Policy
Data Protection Policy
§ 1 Personal Data
a) Personal Data
Personal data are data which disclose or can disclose the customer’s identity. The Christian Partnership Test adheres to the policy of data avoidance. As far as possible, collection of personal data is avoided.
b) Dealings
Personal data exclusively serve to initiate contracts, draft content, execute or process a contractual relationship. As a matter of principle, data are not forwarded to third parties. Data are only forwarded to the logistics company commissioned for the purpose of fulfilling the delivery order, as far as this is necessary for the delivery of the merchandise ordered. To process payments, the required payment data are forwarded to the financial institution commissioned to process payment and, if necessary, to the commissioned and selected payment service provider. Use of personally-related data only takes place to the extent that is necessary, or as far The Christian Partnership Test is legally or by court order required, or if necessary, to prohibit abuse against the General Terms and Conditions in a legitimate manner.
c) Objection
The customer can object to the storage of their personal data at any time. Data, which must be kept ready for the purpose of processing the contract, is exempt from this.
d) Right to Information
Upon request, The Christian Partnership Test shall inform the customer about the storage of their data.
e) Right to Correction, Deletion, and Blocking of Data
The customer has the right to correct, delete or block inaccurate personal data upon request at any time. The use of this right is free-of-charge and can simply be requested by filling out the contact form. As a matter of principle, this service is free-of-charge.
§ 2 User and Registration Data
To set up the Internet page, user and registration data are collected, processed, and used, as necessary. Customer data and IP address are registered with a time and date stamp in the log file, and used and saved for the purpose of this webpage’s statistical evaluation. User and registration data will not be merged with personal data.
§ 3 Data Security
a) Data Security
All data at www.c-partnershiptest.org are saved through technical and organizational measures against loss, destruction, access, modification, and distribution. The Christian Partnership Test does not, however, assume liability for the destruction and damage of data.
b) Sessions and Cookies
To operate the Internet site, The Christian Partnership Test may use cookies or server-based sessions to store data. Cookies are, for instance, used here for personalized greetings by using the member’s name. Cookies are files, which are stored by a website on the customer’s hard drive to automatically recognize this particular computer at the next visit to the website, and adjust the website based on the customer’s use. Cookies can also be rejected through the browser’s settings by deactivating the storage of cookies or by setting the browser in such a way that it informs about the changes upon transmission. The Christian Partnership Test ensures that data related to a person is not transferred from sessions or through cookies.
§ 4 Newsletter
If you subscribe to our newsletter, we will use the data you provided or separately transmitted data to regularly send you our newsletter. To unsubscribe from the newsletter is possible at any time and can either be made by sending a message through the contact options stated or by clicking the link in the newsletter for this purpose.
§ 5 Services by Third-Party Providers
Social Media Links
The Christian Partnership Test uses its own social media sites, made available on this website by clicking on the links of the third-party-providers to be reached. Through the use of these links, you will reach the respective Internet pages of the third-party-provider (e.g. Facebook, Twitter, Google+). As soon as you will have opened up the websites of the third-party-providers, you will have entered the respective third-party-provider’s area of responsibility, so that their data protection policy or their explanations of data usage are effective as well. The Christian Partnership Test does not have any influence over it; we recommend, however, that you log yourself out from the respective third-party-provider’s website prior to using the respective link in order to avoid an unnecessary forwarding of data, so that in certain instances user profiles will not be created by the third-party-provider through the use of the link. The Christian Partnership Test has deliberately only used links and avoided additional plug-ins by third-party-providers to protect your data.
§ 6 Contact information
The customer may contact The Christian Partnership Test at info@fitforfamily.org regarding data protection or by using the contact form.
Imprint
~~Legal Notice
ipso facto Service Provider Identification
within the meaning of §§ 5 TMG, 55 RStV
(TMG: Telemediengesetz/German Teleservices Act,
RStV: Rundfunkstaatsvertrag/Interstate Broadcasting Agreement)
C-partnershiptest
Mr. Christian Pälchen
Herminenstraße 6
31675 Bückeburg
E-Mail: info@fitforfamily.org
Website: www.c-partnershiptest.org
Telephone: +49 (0) 57229201704
Responsible for the content within the meaning of Interstate Broadcast Agreement
[German: RStV – Rundfunkstaatsvertrag]
Mr. Christian Pälchen
Value-Added Tax Identification Number as per § 27 a Value Added Tax Act
DE305200853
Small Entrepreneurs Clause
According to § 19 UStG (German Value Added Tax Act) Christian-Non-Profit-Consulting is a small entrepreneur and as such not entitled to raise VAT.
Online Settlement of Disputes (B2C)
The European Commission has created an Internet platform for Online Settlement of Disputes regarding contractual responsibilities originating from online contracts (OS Platform). The customer can reach the OS Platform by clicking the following link: http://ec.europa.eu/consumers/odr/
Liability for Links
External links on c-partnershiptest’s website connect to content of third-party providers. The respective provider is solely responsible for these contents. Upon notification of legal violations, these links will be removed immediately.
Copyright Notice
The contents and works created and published on this website by c-partnershiptest are protected by the German copyright. Copying, modification, distribution and every kind of application outside of the limits of copyright law require the written approval of the respective author or creator. If content on this website is not created by c-partnershiptest itself, third-party copyright is observed. Third-party content is marked specifically as such. Should you become aware of a copyright violation, please submit a notification accordingly. Upon notification of copyright violations, c-partnershiptest will immediately remove all such content.
Right of Cancellation
Notice to the Right of Cancellation for consumers with long-distance contracts
Right of Cancellation
You may cancel your contract in writing (i.e. letter, facsimile or email) within 14 days without stating reasons.
The cancellation period lasts fourteen (14) days from the day the contract is closed.
To exercise your Right of Cancellation, you must inform us (The Christian Partnership Test, Herminenstrasse 6, 31675 Bückeburg, Telephone: +4957229201704, Email:info@fitforfamily.org) by sending an unequivocal explanation (i.e. a letter sent by regular mail, facsimile, or email) about your decision to cancel this contract. You may use the attached Sample Form of Cancellation, which, however, is not mandatory.
To guarantee the Cancellation Period, it suffices that you send the Notice to the Right of Cancellation before the end of the cancellation period.
Consequences of the Notice to the Right of Cancellation
When you cancel this contract, we will have to return to you all payments which we have received from you, including the delivery cost – as far as these were covered by the customer – (with exception of any additional cost resulting from a different type of delivery method which you may have chosen other than the least expensive standard delivery method offered by us), immediately and within fourteen (14) days at the latest, from the day on which we received the Notice of your Cancellation. For this repayment, we will use the same form of payment which you used for the original transaction, unless other arrangements were specifically made with you, under no circumstance will we charge you with fees due to this repayment.
- End of the Notification to the Right of Cancellation -
Special Notifications about the premature expiration of the Right of Cancellation
Your right to cancel expires prematurely for a contract for the delivery of digital content which does not resemble a physical body (e.g. downloads), if the business owner has already started with the execution of the contract, after you have specifically agreed to it that the business owner starts with the execution of the contract before the cancellation period ends, and you have confirmed your knowledge of it, that you by your acceptance you lose your Right of Cancellation with the start of the execution of your contract.
Sample Form “Notice to Cancel”
(In case you would like to cancel the contract, please fill out this form and return it to us.)
- To: The Christian Partnership Test, Herminenstraße 6, 31675 Bückeburg, Email: info@thechristianpartnershiptest.org:
- Hereby I/we cancel the contract closed by me/us (*) regarding the sale of the following merchandise (*)/the performance of the following services (*)
- Ordered on (*)/received on (*)
- Name of Customer(s)
- Address of Customer(s)
- Signature of Customer(s) (only for notice in paperform) – Date
_________________ (*) Please delete where inapplicable.